Journal of Tax Reform
The Validity of Personal Income Tax Deductions: Analyzing Expenses for Children’s Education in Private Schools in Moscow
Evgenii V. Leontev, Yulia V. Leontieva, Sergey A. Shirshov, Elizaveta Yu. Linnik
Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin, Yekaterinburg, Russia
Abstract
Tax incentives are commonly used to support various sectors and population, and this study delves into the realm of deductions for the personal income tax (known as NDFL in Russia). We explore differing perspectives on these deductions, considering them either as investments in human capital for future income growth or as a form of government-initiated financing for specific sectors. Focusing on deductions related to children’s education expenses in private schools, the research evaluates the effectiveness of budgetary investments in this sector. Using DEA analysis, the study assesses private schools based on factors like teacher-student ratios, classroom space per student, and access to computers and educational literature. The learning outcomes were measured by the number of high performers in the Unified State Exam and the number of 9th-grade graduates with certificates of distinction. The evaluation of learning outcomes reveals that many private schools in Moscow prioritize comfort over educational standards and the majority of them perform below the average levels in terms of effectiveness. The findings prompt questions about the feasibility of including private school expenses in personal income tax deductions. The proposed approach recommends tying eligibility for these deductions to the effectiveness of private schools, ensuring a more targeted and impactful use of tax benefits.
Keywords
personal income tax, tax deductions, private schools, data envelopment analysis, effectiveness of tax deductions
JEL classification
I22, I26, H22, H31References
1. Mayburov I.A., Kireenko A.P. Tax reforms and elections in modern Russia. Journal of Tax Reform. 2018;4(1);73–94. https://doi.org/10.15826/jtr.2018.4.1.046
2. Kireenko A.P., Krasikova T.Y. Personal Income Tax Deductions and Demand for Education: Case of Russia. Journal of Tax Reform. 2023;9(2):145–160. https://doi.org/10.15826/jtr.2023.9.2.134
3. Baake P., Borck R, Loffeer A. Complexity and progressivity in income tax design: Deductions for work-related expenses. International Tax and Public Finance. 2004;11(3):299–312. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ITAX.0000021973.38388.da
4. Givati Y. Theories of Tax Deductions: Income Measurement versus Efficiency. Journal of Law, Finance, and Accounting. 2020;5(1):107–136. https://doi.org/10.1561/108.00000042
5. Thuronyi V. Tax Expenditures: A Reassessment. Duke Law Journal. 1988;6:1155–1206. https://doi.org/10.2307/1372533
6. Surrey S.S. Pathways to tax reform: the concept of tax expenditures. Harvard University Press, 1973. https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674436503
7. Andrews W.D. Personal deductions in an ideal income tax. Harvard Law Review. 1972;86(2):309–385. https://doi.org/10.2307/1339894
8. Bittker B.I. Income Tax Deductions, Credits, and Subsidies for Personal Expenditures. Journal of Law & Economics. 1973;16(2):193–213. https://www.jstor.org/stable/724766
9. Griffith T. D. Theories of Personal Deductions in the Income Tax. Hastings Law Journal. 1989;40(2):343–395. Available at: https://repository.uclawsf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2964&context=hastings_law_journal (accessed: 29.01.2024).
10. Binner A., Day B. Exploring mortgage interest deduction reforms: An equilibrium sorting model with endogenous tenure choice. Journal of Public Economics. 2015;122:40–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2014.12.005
11. Mel’nikova N.P., Tikhonova A.V. Property Tax Deductions and Fairness of Personal Income Taxation. International Accounting. 2018;21(9):1100–1112. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24891/ia.21.9.1100
12. Saez E. The optimal treatment of tax expenditures. Journal of Public Economics. 2004;88(12):2657–2684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2003.09.004
13. Baldry J. Income Tax Deductions for Work-related Expenses: The Rationale Examined. Australian Economic Papers. 1998;37(1):45–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8454.00005
14. Wrede M. Should commuting expenses be tax deductible? A welfare analysis. Journal of Urban Economics. 2001;49(1):80–99. https://doi.org/10.1006/juec.2000.2185
15. Dreier P. The new politics of housing: How to rebuild the constituency for a progressive federal housing policy. Journal of the American Planning Association. 1997;63(1):5–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944369708975721
16. Green R.K., Vandell K.D. Giving households credit: How changes in the US tax code could promote homeownership. Regional Science and Urban Economics. 1999;29(4):419–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-0462(99)00005-8
17. Bierbrauer F.J., Boyer P.C., Hansen E. Pareto-improving tax reforms and the Earned Income Tax Credit. Econometrica. 2023;91(3):1077–1103. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA18600
18. Bastian J. The rise of working mothers and the 1975 earned income tax credit. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy. 2020;12(3):44–75. https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.20180039
19. Stiglitz J.E. Economics of the Public Sector. 3rd ed. New York. 1986. Available at: https://edisciplinas.usp.br/pluginfile.php/5663433/mod_resource/content/1/Stiglitz-Economics-of-the-Public-Sector%281%29.pdf (accessed: 24.01.2024).
20. Christiansen V. Which commodity taxes should supplement the income tax? Journal of Public Economics. 1984;24(2):195–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(84)90024-0
21. Kleven H.J. Optimum taxation and the allocation of time. Journal of Public Economics. 2004;88(3-4):545–557. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(02)00192-5
22. Doerrenberg P., Peichl A., Siegloch S. The elasticity of taxable income in the presence of deduction possibilities. Journal of Public Economics. 2017;151:41–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2015.10.001
23. Samwick A.A. Donating the Voucher: An Alternative Tax Treatment of Private School Enrollment. Tax Policy and the Economy. 2013;27(1):125–160. https://doi.org/10.1086/671246
24. Smart H.F. Tax Deductions as Permissible State Aid to Parocial Schools-Mueller v. Allen. Chicago-Kent Law Review. 1984;60(3):657–681. Available at: https://scholarship.kentlaw.iit.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2541&context=cklawreview (accessed: 29.01.2024).
25. Boyer J.D. Education Tax Credits in a Post-Zelman Era: Legal, Political, and Policy Alternatives to Vouchers? Educational Policy. 2007;21(1):73–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904806296935
26. Tikhonova A. Development of Tax Incentives for Investments in Human Capital. Financial Journal. 2023;1:116–133. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.31107/2075-1990-2023-1-116-133
27. Graetz M.J., Schenk D.H., Alstott A.L. Federal income taxation: principles and policies. Foundation Press, 2018. Available at: https://faculty.westacademic.com/Book/Detail?id=336796 (accessed: 29.01.2024).
28. Bradford D.F. Untangling the income tax. Harvard University Press, 1986. https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674733930
29. Kaplow L. Taxation. NBER Working Paper No. w12061, 2006. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=888263 (accessed: 29.01.2024).
30. Richter W.F. Efficiency effects of tax deductions for work-related expenses. International Tax and Public Finance. 2006;13:685–699. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-006-6602-6
31. Bittker B.I. Equity, efficiency, and income tax theory: Do misallocations drive out inequities. San Diego Law Review. 1978;16:735–748. Available at: https://digital.sandiego.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1896&context=sdlr (accessed: 29.01.2024).
32. Bittker B.I. Federal income taxation and the family. Stanford Law Review. 1974;27(6):1389–1463. https://doi.org/10.2307/1228181
33. Eberts R.W., Hollenbeck K. An Examination of Student Achievement in Michigan Charter Schools. W.E. Upjohn Institute Working Paper No. 01-68. 2001. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.292227
34. Hollenbeck K., Nelson C. Does Charter School Attendance Improve Test Scores? Comments and Reactions on the Arizona Achievement Study. W.E. Upjohn Institute Working Paper No. 01-70. 2001. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.292228
35. Bettinger E.P. The effect of charter schools on charter students and public schools. Economics of Education Review. 2005;24(2):133–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2004.04.009
36. Clark M.A., Gleason P.M., Tuttle C.C., Silverberg M.K. Do Charter Schools Improve Student Achievement? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. 2015;37(4):419–436. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373714558292
37. Bifulco R., Ladd H.F. The Impacts of Charter Schools on Student Achievement: Evidence from North Carolina. Education Finance and Policy. 2006;1(1):50–90. https://doi.org/10.1162/edfp.2006.1.1.50
38. Ladd H.F., Singleton J.D. The fiscal externalities of charter schools: Evidence from North Carolina. Education Finance and Policy. 2020;15(1):191–208. https://doi.org/10.1162/edfp_a_00272
39. Charnes A., Cooper W.W., Rhodes E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research. 1978;2(6):429–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
40. Charnes A., Cooper W.W., Rhodes E. Evaluating program and managerial efficiency: an application of data envelopment analysis to program follow through. Management Science. 1981;27(6):668–697. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.27.6.668
41. Mancebon M.J., Molinero C.M. Performance in primary schools. Journal of the Operational Research Society. 2000;51(7):843–854. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2600980
42. Abbott M., Doucouliagos C. The efficiency of Australian universities: a data envelopment analysis. Economics of Education Review. 2003;22(1):89–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7757(01)00068-1
About Authors
Evgenii V. Leontev – Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Associate Professor of the Department of Financial and Tax Management, Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin (620002, Ekaterinburg, Mira St., 19); ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7531-8078; e-mail: Pasparto@yandex.ru
Yulia V. Leontyeva – Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Associate Professor of the Department of Financial and Tax Management, Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin (620002, Ekaterinburg, Mira St., 19); ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4676-9926; e-mail: uv.leonteva@mail.ru
Sergey A. Shirshov – Student of the Department of Financial and Tax Management, Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin (620002, Ekaterinburg, Mira St., 19); ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0000-7084-1153; e-mail: serg.sh.02@mail.ru
Elizaveta Yu. Linnik – Student of the Department of International Economics and Management, Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin (620002, Ekaterinburg, Mira St., 19); ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0001-5712-0367; e-mail: linnik03_03@mail.ru
For citation
Leontev E.V., Leontieva Yu.V., Shirshov S.A., Linnik E.Yu. The Validity of Personal Income Tax Deductions: Analyzing Expenses for Children’s Education in Private Schools in Moscow. Journal of Tax Reform. 2024;10(1):84–99. doi.org/10.15826/jtr.2024.10.1.158
Article info
Received February 6, 2024; Revised February 29, 2024; Accepted March 1, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15826/jtr.2024.10.1.158
Download full text article:
~537 KB, *.pdf
(Uploaded
16.04.2024)
Created / Updated: 31 August 2015 / 3 July 2017
© Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education «Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N.Yeltsin»
Remarks?
select the text and press:
Ctrl + Enter
Portal design: Artsofte
ISSN 2414-9497 (online)