Journal of Tax Reform
The Impact of Indirect Taxation on Inequality in Russia
Andrey A. Pugachev
Demidov Yаroslavl State University, Yаroslavl, Russian Federation
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to consider the effects of indirect taxes, VAT in particular, on inequality. The study tests the hypothesis that indirect taxation in Russia does not have a significant impact on inequality but has a potential to reduce it. Methodologically, the study relies on correlation regression analysis, time series analysis, structural analysis and the index method. The data used for the analysis are provided by the Federal State Statistics Service (Rosstat) and Federal Tax Service for the period from 1992 to 2021. Calculations were conducted with the help of Data Analysis ToolPak in MS Excel. A classification of the types of economic inequality is proposed together with the corresponding fiscal instruments used to tackle each type. Indirect taxes are considered to be capable of reducing consumption inequality. To evaluate the influence of indirect taxation on inequality, the following parameters were considered: VAT-to-GDP ratio and the share of VAT in total tax revenues of the consolidated budget, share of revenue raised through 10% VAT in the total volume of VAT, and the decile ratio of consumption spending. It was found that indirect taxes in Russia do not have a significant impact on inequality. Although in some years VAT receipts accounted for a larger share in total tax revenues and in GDP and this trend was accompanied by lower levels of inequality, this happened because of the influence of other factors, for example, the use of the progressive scale of the personal income tax in the 1990s. To reduce inequality, a viable solution for the government would be to apply a system of differentiated VAT rates to balance disparities in consumption of the wealthiest and poorest households (these differences are reflected in Rosstat data on consumption). Moreover, since utilities, telecommunications and food constitute up to 70% of the poor’s expenditures, it would make sense to lower the VAT rate for these categories of goods and services while raising the rate for such categories as hospitality services, cafes and restaurants, recreation and leisure services because in total, these categories account for 13.2% of the expenditures of the wealthiest households. Unfortunately, in 2022, the government took the decision to apply zero-rated VAT to these services as part of the anti-crisis program.
Keywords
indirect taxes, VAT, inequality, monetary inequality, differentiation, stratification, equalization
JEL classification
H21, H24References
1. Kuznets S. Economic Growth and Income Inequality. The American Economic Review, 1955;1(45):1–28. Available at: https://assets.aeaweb.org/asset-server/files/9438.pdf
2. Piketti T. Capital in XXI century. Cambridge Massachusetts: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press; 2014. Available at: https://dowbor.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/14Thomas-Piketty.pdf
3. Yurevich М. Social Inequality, Investment, and Economic Growth. Journal of Economic Regulation. 2019;4(10):35–46. https://doi.org/10.17835/2078-5429.2019.10.4.035-046
4. Brückner M., Lederman D. Effects of Income Inequality on Aggregate Output. Policy Research Working Paper. 2015;6:2–32. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10986/22203
5. Stiglitz J. The price of inequality: how today’s divided society endangers our future. New York; 2012. http://resistir.info/livros/stiglitz_the_price_of_inequality.pdf
6. Atkinson A.B. Inequality: What can be done? Harvard University Press; 2015. Available at: https://www.acarindex.com/dosyalar/kitap/acarindex-1436513133.pdf
7. Alvaredo F., Chancel L., Piketty T., Saez E., Zucman G. World Inequality Report– 2018. Executive Summary. World Inequality Lab; 2017. 20 р. Available at: https://wir2018.wid.world/files/download/wir2018-summary-english.pdf
8. Piketty T., Saez E., Zucman G. Distributional national accounts: methods and estimates for the United States. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 2018;133(2):586–587. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjx043
9. Auten G., Splinter D. Income Inequality in the United States: Using Tax Data to Measure Long-Term Trends. February 18, 2022. 44 p. Available at: http://davidsplinter.com/AutenSplinter-Tax_Data_and_Inequality.pdf
10. Moździerz A. Tax Policy and Income Inequality in the Visegrad Countries. Naše gospodarstvo/Our Economy. 2015;61(6):12–18. https://doi.org/10.1515/ngoe-2015-0022
11. Mihaescu F., Voinea L. The Impact of the Flat Tax Reform on Inequality: The Case of Romania. Wiiw Balkan Observatory Working Papers. No. 81, 2009. 23 p. Available at: https://wiiw.ac.at/the-impact-of-the-flat-tax-reform-on-inequality-the-case-of-romania-dlp3217.pdf
12. Ilie S. Income Inequalities in Romania in the Aftermath of the 2008 Economic Crisis. Romanian Journal of Economic Forecasting. 2020;23(2):115–130. Available at: https://ipe.ro/rjef/rjef2_20/rjef2_2020p115-130.pdf
13. Tanchev S. How the proportional income taxation increases inequality in Bulgaria. Journal of Tax Reform. 2021;7(3):244–254. https://doi.org/10.15826/jtr.2021.7.3.101
14. Pugachev A.A. Taxation-Based Indicators as a Measure of Income Inequality in Russian Regions. Journal of Tax Reform. 2022;8(1):40–53. https://doi.org/10.15826/jtr.2022.8.1.107
15. Martorano B. Taxation and inequality in developing countries: Lessons from the recent experience of Latin America. Journal of International Development. 2018;30(2):256–273. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.3350
16. Martorano B. Tax Policy and Inequality in Latin America. June 2018. 30 р. Available at: https://internationalbudget.org/wp-content/uploads/tax-policy-and-inequality-latin-america-english-2018.pdf
17. Hanni M., MartnerFanta, R., Podestá A. The Redistributive Potential of Taxation in Latin America. CEPAL Review. 2015;116:7–26. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/11362/39603
18. Goñi E., Lopéz J., Servén L. Fiscal Redistribution and Income Inequality in Latin America. World Development. 2008;39(9):1558–1569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.04.025
19. Ciminelli G., Ernst E., Meriola R. Giuliodori M. The composition effects of tax-based consolidations on income inequality. European Journal of Political Economy. 2019;57:107–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2018.08.009
20. Ilaboya O.J., Ohomba N. Direct Versus Indirect Taxation and Income Inequality. European Journal of Accounting Auditing and Finance Research. 2013;1(1):1–15. Available at: https://www.eajournals.org/wp-content/uploads/DIRECT-VERSUS-INDIRECT-TAXATION-AND-INCOME-INEQUALITY.pdf
21. Webber D., Thomas N. The effects of taxes and benefits on income inequality: 1977 to financial year ending 2015. Census; 2021. 25 p. Available at: https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/personalandhouseholdfinances/incomeandwealth/bulletins/theeffectsoftaxesandbenefitsonincomeinequality/1977tofinancialyearending2015
22. Barnard A. The effect of taxes and benefits on household income 2008/2009. Economic & Labour Market Review. 2010;4(7):36–47. https://doi.org/10.1057/elmr.2010.95
23. Martınez-Vazquez J., Dodson B.M., Vulovic V. The impact of tax and expenditure policies on income distribution: Evidence from a large panel of countries. Hacienda P´ublica Espa˜nola. 2012;200(1):95–130. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2188608
24. Cuceu I., Văidean V. Redistributing Income through VAT. Economic Sciences Series. 2018;18(2):588–592. Available at: https://ideas.repec.org/a/ovi/oviste/vxviiiy2018i2p588-592.html
25. Gornia G. Inequality trends and their determinants. World Institute for Development Economics Research Working Paper. 2012/09. 44 p. Available at: https://www.wider.unu.edu/sites/default/files/wp2012-009.pdf
26. Blasco J., Guillaud E., Zemmour М. Consumption taxes and income inequality An international perspective with microsimulation. Luxembourg Income Study Working Papers Series. 2020;785:1–35. Available at: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02735145/document
27. Muinelo-Gallo L.; Roca-Sagal´es O. Joint determinants of fiscal policy, income inequality and economic growth. Economic Modelling. 2013;30:814–824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2012.11.009
28. Bénabou R. Unequal Societies: Income Distribution and the Social Contract. American Economic Review. 2000;90:96–129. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.90.1.96
29. Hindriks J., Myles G.D. Intermediate Public Economics. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts; 2013. Available at: https://dspace.uef.edu.vn/bitstream/123456789/29440/1/Intermediate%20public%20economics%20-2013-336r.pdf
30. Guillaud E., Olckers M., Zemmour M. Four levers of redistribution: The impact of tax and transfer systems on inequality reduction. Luxembourg Income Study Working Papers Series. 2017;695:1–38. Available at: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02735326/document
31. Decoster А., Loughrey J., O’Donoghue С., Verwerft D. How regressive are indirect taxes? A microsimulation analysis for five European countries. Journal of Policy analysis and Management. 2010;29(2):326–350. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.20494
32. Figari F., Paulus А. The Distributional Effects of Taxes and Transfers Under Alternative Income Concepts: The Importance of Three «I» s. Public Finance Review. 2015;43(3):347–372. https://doi.org/10.1177/1091142113506930
33. Savage M. Integrated Modelling of the Impact of Direct and Indirect Taxes Using Complementary Datasets. The Economic and Social Review. 2017;48(2):171–205. Available at: https://www.esri.ie/system/files/media/file-uploads/2017-06/JA201727.pdf
34. Bargain O., Dolls M., Immervoll H., Neumann D., Peiechl A., Pestel N., Seigloch S. Tax policy and income inequality in the U.S., 1976–2009: A Decomposition Approach Society for the Study of Economic Inequality. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2011;5910:1–45. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1913617
Acknowledgements
The article was prepared supported by the grant of the President of the Russian Federation No. MK-2397.2022.2.
About Authors
Andrey A. Pugachev – Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Finance and Credit, P.G. Demidov Yaroslavl State University (14 Sovetskaya str., Yaroslavl, 150003); ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7989-6353; e-mail: andrxim@yandex.ru.
For citation
Pugachev A.A. The Impact of Indirect Taxation on Inequality in Russia. Journal of Tax Reform. 2023;9(1):19–33. https://doi.org/10.15826/jtr.2023.9.1.126
Article info
Received November 2, 2022; Revised December 7, 2022; Accepted January 11, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15826/jtr.2023.9.1.126
Download full text article:
~537 KB, *.pdf
(Uploaded
17.04.2023)
Created / Updated: 31 August 2015 / 3 July 2017
© Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education «Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N.Yeltsin»
Remarks?
select the text and press:
Ctrl + Enter
Portal design: Artsofte
ISSN 2414-9497 (online)